Ideas & Quotes |
For all of the great ideas and quotes we loved instantly and forgot immediately |
Here are the two most shattering facts about classical music today: First, Americans are writing, playing, recording and listening to more orchestra music today than they ever have before in history—mostly in the form of film music and video game soundtracks. So we know they like the general sound.
They just don’t like listening to it with us, at concert halls. And that is the second fact.
"Richard Dare, CEO and Managing Director Brooklyn Philharmonic, in The Awfulness of Classical Music Explained (via kenhiatt)
Totally applies to me. The cost (and opportunity cost) of classical concerts just aren’t worth it.
(Source: The Huffington Post, via kenhiatt)
kenhiatt, paraphrased in the beginning. We could go further and argue that semis should always have right-of-way!
(If you’re unfamiliar with the issues with the US patent system, click here for a quick explanation.)
As it currently stands, most programmers dislike the patent system. One reason is the frequency in which “new” technologies appear at the same time:
[S]urveys of hundreds of significant new technologies show that almost all of them are invented simultaneously or nearly simultaneously by two or more teams working independently of each other. Invention appears in significant part to be a social, not an individual, phenomenon.
(Mark Lemley, via The Economist)
In addition, most employees file their patents into company control. Dying companies, once defined by innovation, can use those patents to stave off death, suing others. Yahoo is one example:
Yahoo tried and failed, over and over again, to build a social network that people would love and use. Unable to innovate, Yahoo is falling back to the last resort of a desperate, dying company: litigation as a business model.
(Andy Baio, via Kottke; see below for more information of the cost of patent litigation)
What can programmers do? If they refuse to patent at all, they risk being sued by someone else.
But there is a solution!
There are some limitations, but overall, this is a great step in the right direction. Defensive litigation protects against patent trolls in the present, and the lack of offensive litigation prevents these patents from falling into the hands of patent trolls in the future.
Bonus: “How I Beat a Patent Troll”
Drew Curtis demonstrates another solution: “Whenever possible, fight the infringement, not the patent.” (via kenhiatt)
An endnote, near the end of Drew’s presentation, on the cost of defending patent troll lawsuits, even if you’re successful in defending yourself:
[via]
So close.
[iothecorgi]
I’m sort of thrown off today. it’s hard to be motivated to bring you science when there’s Reality going on.
When something hits...
god toy story 3 did you have to be such a disappointment
[via]
If you’re looking for a Delicious Thanksgiving party look no further:New York’s Hottest thanksgiving club is “Stuffing”
Built on an abandoned Soup...
TMNT Pumpkin
[via]